U.S. prosecutors have finally planned to submit their argument in an ICO Fraud. In fact it will prove to be an oversized argument. As we all know that Initial Coin Offering (ICO) refers to someone offering the crypto investors some new cryptocurrency units or crypto-token in exchange against cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum.
Background of that argument
Maksim Zaslavskiy is by birth United States citizen living in Brooklyn, NY. He is the founder of REcoin and Diamond Reserve Club. REcoin was designed in the form of an innovative token system where brokers, tenants and purchasers etc could purchase REcoin tokens to make easy a variety of real estate transactions. It was claimed that it will also allow users to enter into smart contracts – with the passage of time it all proved to be an illusion.
In Sept. 29, 2017 — the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused him with a fraud case investors in an initial coin offerings (ICOs).This fraud had a further links to investments in real estate and diamond industry. Maksim Zaslavskiy was being alleged that the digital tokens offered by him did not really exist.
That’s why In September 2017, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a suit against Maksim Zaslavskiy , and he was arrested and charged by the Department of Justice (DOJ) in November 2017. As the SEC suit stayed pending due to an outcome of that action, Maksim Zaslavskiy easily pled not guilty to the allegations filed against him. Now, it is in the news that Maksim Zaslavskiy is trying his best to dismiss the lawsuit against him. Maksim Zaslavskiy’s point of view is that tokens sold through an ICO are technically not considered as securities.
What is the statement of SEC?
The statement of SEC goes totally against Maksim Zaslavskiy. That’s the reason why the case of Maksim Zaslavskiy has set the stage for a U.S. federal court that whether token sales can be considered as securities or not.
Furthermore, the Department of Justice is going to submit a reminder that is expected to prove false the claim filed by Maksim Zaslavskiy. It is also in the news that this filing is expected to exceed the maximum size allowed by the court for such arguments, hence a request will also be submitted to grant an exception in that specific case. Though no further details on this topic are to be found elsewhere, however, it is being assumed that the filing in question will be an extraordinary one.